The first thing that caught my attention about Barfblog was,
of course, its’ name. Although it
put unpleasant pictures in my mind, I actually appreciated the theme once I
arrived at the site. The color
scheme goes along with the whole theme, which is pretty creative, in a weird
way. Navigating through the site
is quite painless; the layout is very simple and organized. A straightforward web design is on the
top of my list of criteria for a good blog site. Furthermore, the site is not cluttered with advertisements
which is refreshing for a modern day website. I’ll give the site an A in design.
Next on that list would be the blogs connections to my life
and how I can relate to the opinions being shared. The first blog I read was about a soccer match that I was
actually watching live, so I was originally very impressed with the site. When I read a few more, I had the
realization that most of the blogs were actually uninteresting and even
tiresome. Foe example, I read one
about Anzac day, a grim holiday that commemorates the battle of Gallipoli,
which apparently was a colossal failure.
This blog would be interesting to a 70-year-old Australian man; however,
I do not fall under that category.
The blog’s main purpose is supposedly “to offer evidence-based opinions
on current safety issues.”
However, reading these blogs, I didn’t notice a lot of evidence to back
up their positions. While these
issues might be very important to a large group, I do not have particular
interest in them. I don’t really
want to read blogs about Hepatitis A or how to wash your hands properly. Minus points in my book.
My list of criteria continues; blogs must not be too long or
they will lose my attention. While
some of the blogs on Barfblog are relatively long, I noticed that the majority
of them are pretty short. I like
to see this in blogs because I appreciate writers getting straight to the
point, instead of rambling on while beating around the bush.
As for my final analysis of Barfblog, it appears that the
site’s format is exactly what I’m looking for in blogs. The easy-to-navigate
design, the color scheme, the lack of ads, and the lengths of the blogs all
contribute to my affection for this site.
However, the topics being unrelated to my personal interests makes it
hard for me to spend time reading these blogs. In conclusion, the my lack of interest in the subjects
surpass my liking for its design.
I acknowledge that to some, this blog may be perfect as it covers all
the issues they care most about.
But this is simply my personal evaluation.
Funny that we both agree on the web theme and lack of advertising! Overall I liked this post quite a bit. I agree that although it meets most of the criteria for a good blog, the topic pertains really to only parents, old people, and otherwise people who care about nitty gritty details of lettuce and hand washing standards. Good job!
ReplyDeleteWe definitely thought along the same lines in our evaluation of this blog. I really appreciated your balance between critisicm of content and appraisal of design. While I personally found the design boring and uncreative, I did appreciate its simplicity. I believe you explained your criteria for the visual appeal pretty well, but you may benefit from a more detailed explanation of your content criteria. Even though the blog topics may not appeal to you personally, perhaps you could evalaute them objectively in comparison to other blogs on the topic.
ReplyDelete